<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle of Halton, day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/</link>
	<description>Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean P. Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/comment-page-3/#comment-25683</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P. Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/#comment-25683</guid>
		<description>Judy, my Bible doesn&#039;t say, love mankind and accept sin and good.  Jesus never said that he would allow unrepentent sinners to enter into heaven.  Your misinterpretations are based on what you want rather than what is actually being said.  If you&#039;re going to try and tell a Christian what the Bible says, please go see a priest and ask him honestly and you&#039;ll get your answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, my Bible doesn&#8217;t say, love mankind and accept sin and good.  Jesus never said that he would allow unrepentent sinners to enter into heaven.  Your misinterpretations are based on what you want rather than what is actually being said.  If you&#8217;re going to try and tell a Christian what the Bible says, please go see a priest and ask him honestly and you&#8217;ll get your answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Chans Left Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/comment-page-3/#comment-25616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Chans Left Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/#comment-25616</guid>
		<description>Another voice from the delusional neo-nazi&#039;s .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another voice from the delusional neo-nazi&#8217;s .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/comment-page-3/#comment-25605</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/08/15/garth-1-rev-0/#comment-25605</guid>
		<description>Liberal Party? - Not a Chance.

For Werner, Frankie, KF, Blanks 57, Jackies Left Hand, and other wacko Liberals who suggest that Mr. Turner join your party, a little reality check is in order.

Consider that he would be joining: 
â€¢	A federal political party that is considered to be the most corrupt one in Canadian history; 
â€¢	A party who throughout Canadian history have refused to in any way democratize our unelected senate.
â€¢	A leaderless party who hasnâ€™t one experienced, credible, leadership contender with both leadership qualities and integrity. EG- Tips offs  a banker friend on forthcoming government finance policies; speaks in parliament wildly of  â€˜burning crosses as we speakâ€™; approves of torture as a means  to get prisoners to talk; a former provincial premier who thought it good economic policy to â€˜buy their way out of a recessionâ€™; one who would have small children â€˜financing his leadership campaignâ€™. The list seems endless.
â€¢	A party who bought off Belinda babe (Canadaâ€™s answer to Paris Hilton) with a cabinet post just to get her vote on a non- confidence motion.
â€¢	A party whose former PM, while Finance Minister, accepted federal government grants  worth several million dollars for his 100 % owned transport company and when confronted with this fact in the hallways of parliament, pretended that he didnâ€™t know about it â€“â€œIâ€™m shocked he statedâ€. Since he was then aware of it, he has not returned one cent of it. Perhaps the PM of the day was trying to buy his loyalty or to stop the back stabbing of him.
â€¢	A party of â€œIâ€™m entitled to my entitlementsâ€ mentality.
â€¢	A party who has yet to account for the tens of millions of dollars that disappeared in the â€œSponsorship Scandalâ€.
â€¢	A party whoâ€™s PM who was thrown out by a plotting successor against his will.
â€¢	The party whose ex PM used his influence in obtaining a loan for a former convicted criminal, in a financial deal which would impact the value of the PMs adjoining personal property.
â€¢	A party whose members for the most part swallowed the bull that they had put our federal fiscal house I order when in reality they only transferred the deficit to the provinces.
â€¢	-A party that left power with 500+ billion dollars in debt and at a repayment rate that even my grandchildren could not repay in their lifetimes.

There is not a snowballs chance in hell of a principled MP, such as Mr. Turner, jumping to such a party, that has such a shameful history. Collectively, give your heads a very big shake. 

The Liberal legacy lives on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal Party? &#8211; Not a Chance.</p>
<p>For Werner, Frankie, KF, Blanks 57, Jackies Left Hand, and other wacko Liberals who suggest that Mr. Turner join your party, a little reality check is in order.</p>
<p>Consider that he would be joining:<br />
â€¢	A federal political party that is considered to be the most corrupt one in Canadian history;<br />
â€¢	A party who throughout Canadian history have refused to in any way democratize our unelected senate.<br />
â€¢	A leaderless party who hasnâ€™t one experienced, credible, leadership contender with both leadership qualities and integrity. EG- Tips offs  a banker friend on forthcoming government finance policies; speaks in parliament wildly of  â€˜burning crosses as we speakâ€™; approves of torture as a means  to get prisoners to talk; a former provincial premier who thought it good economic policy to â€˜buy their way out of a recessionâ€™; one who would have small children â€˜financing his leadership campaignâ€™. The list seems endless.<br />
â€¢	A party who bought off Belinda babe (Canadaâ€™s answer to Paris Hilton) with a cabinet post just to get her vote on a non- confidence motion.<br />
â€¢	A party whose former PM, while Finance Minister, accepted federal government grants  worth several million dollars for his 100 % owned transport company and when confronted with this fact in the hallways of parliament, pretended that he didnâ€™t know about it â€“â€œIâ€™m shocked he statedâ€. Since he was then aware of it, he has not returned one cent of it. Perhaps the PM of the day was trying to buy his loyalty or to stop the back stabbing of him.<br />
â€¢	A party of â€œIâ€™m entitled to my entitlementsâ€ mentality.<br />
â€¢	A party who has yet to account for the tens of millions of dollars that disappeared in the â€œSponsorship Scandalâ€.<br />
â€¢	A party whoâ€™s PM who was thrown out by a plotting successor against his will.<br />
â€¢	The party whose ex PM used his influence in obtaining a loan for a former convicted criminal, in a financial deal which would impact the value of the PMs adjoining personal property.<br />
â€¢	A party whose members for the most part swallowed the bull that they had put our federal fiscal house I order when in reality they only transferred the deficit to the provinces.<br />
â€¢	-A party that left power with 500+ billion dollars in debt and at a repayment rate that even my grandchildren could not repay in their lifetimes.</p>
<p>There is not a snowballs chance in hell of a principled MP, such as Mr. Turner, jumping to such a party, that has such a shameful history. Collectively, give your heads a very big shake. </p>
<p>The Liberal legacy lives on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
