<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No free lunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/</link>
	<description>Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boo Hoo</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/comment-page-2/#comment-43155</link>
		<dc:creator>Boo Hoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/#comment-43155</guid>
		<description>Boo frickin hoo. You are an arrogant self centred person.  Halton voters clearly made a big error.  They will correct it though.  You think you are bigger than the whole.  Rack up your pension while you can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo frickin hoo. You are an arrogant self centred person.  Halton voters clearly made a big error.  They will correct it though.  You think you are bigger than the whole.  Rack up your pension while you can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/comment-page-2/#comment-42856</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/#comment-42856</guid>
		<description>Garth, you&#039;re getting a lot of flack here that you don&#039;t deserve... I have the sense that you will continue being outspoken no matter how many clueless clods deem you to be a &quot;whiner&quot; or any such thing, so I have no worries... but did wish to communicate my support. What you do takes courage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garth, you&#8217;re getting a lot of flack here that you don&#8217;t deserve&#8230; I have the sense that you will continue being outspoken no matter how many clueless clods deem you to be a &#8220;whiner&#8221; or any such thing, so I have no worries&#8230; but did wish to communicate my support. What you do takes courage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Neilson</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/comment-page-2/#comment-42740</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Neilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/27/no-free-lunch/#comment-42740</guid>
		<description>Garth, with respect to your response to Stephen Taylor - there are many different kinds of (big C) Conservatives - you don&#039;t even have to be (small c) conservative to be Conservative - but conservatives believe in certain things, just like libertarians do, because it&#039;s conservatism and libertarianism are philosophies and not political groups. 

While being in favour of a gun registry and opposed to marijuana legalization obviously don&#039;t make you a bad person or a bad Conservative (in fact they probably make you a fairly good conservative), but it&#039;s awfully hard to be a libertarian when you&#039;re in favour of government intervention in parts of an individual&#039;s life that really have no effect on anyone else. 

There are fairly fundamental things that you need to believe in to be considered a libertarian. In the same way that being in favour of raising taxes to spend on something like affirmative action or funding something like Greenpeace makes your political philosophy distinctly non-conservative, being opposed to something like deregulating someone&#039;s property or legalizing marijuana in the interest of the &quot;public good&quot; make you distinctly non-libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garth, with respect to your response to Stephen Taylor &#8211; there are many different kinds of (big C) Conservatives &#8211; you don&#8217;t even have to be (small c) conservative to be Conservative &#8211; but conservatives believe in certain things, just like libertarians do, because it&#8217;s conservatism and libertarianism are philosophies and not political groups. </p>
<p>While being in favour of a gun registry and opposed to marijuana legalization obviously don&#8217;t make you a bad person or a bad Conservative (in fact they probably make you a fairly good conservative), but it&#8217;s awfully hard to be a libertarian when you&#8217;re in favour of government intervention in parts of an individual&#8217;s life that really have no effect on anyone else. </p>
<p>There are fairly fundamental things that you need to believe in to be considered a libertarian. In the same way that being in favour of raising taxes to spend on something like affirmative action or funding something like Greenpeace makes your political philosophy distinctly non-conservative, being opposed to something like deregulating someone&#8217;s property or legalizing marijuana in the interest of the &#8220;public good&#8221; make you distinctly non-libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
