<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quebecois nation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/</link>
	<description>Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: trueconservative</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-50518</link>
		<dc:creator>trueconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/#comment-50518</guid>
		<description>Garth, as I have asked earlier and you refuse to post and censor me. But tell me as your constituent what your position on the Bloc and its motion to bring down the government is?

Do you support the mission as is?
If you do not why? What do you think should change, and what actions should be taken?

These are legitimate questions stop suppressing them. If you continue to censor me while advertising this forum as center of digital democracy, I will be writing to some media sources next. I am sure they will have an interest in this hypocritical behavior given the bold statements and positions you have taken against your party and on citizen oriented democracy.

&lt;em&gt;I emailed you privately yesterday, and said: &quot;Your posts are valued, as is your opinion. I will be happy to publish your remarks any time they are framed in respectful language, and when you reveal your identity.&quot; You did not respond to my note, but continue to try to get posts published here, and now you are threatening me &quot;by writing to some media sources.&quot; Well, Trueconservative, knock yourself out. I will not be intimidated or bullied by you, and you will not be allowed to post disrespctful and non-constructive comments just because you feel like dumping on others. -- Garth&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garth, as I have asked earlier and you refuse to post and censor me. But tell me as your constituent what your position on the Bloc and its motion to bring down the government is?</p>
<p>Do you support the mission as is?<br />
If you do not why? What do you think should change, and what actions should be taken?</p>
<p>These are legitimate questions stop suppressing them. If you continue to censor me while advertising this forum as center of digital democracy, I will be writing to some media sources next. I am sure they will have an interest in this hypocritical behavior given the bold statements and positions you have taken against your party and on citizen oriented democracy.</p>
<p><em>I emailed you privately yesterday, and said: &#8220;Your posts are valued, as is your opinion. I will be happy to publish your remarks any time they are framed in respectful language, and when you reveal your identity.&#8221; You did not respond to my note, but continue to try to get posts published here, and now you are threatening me &#8220;by writing to some media sources.&#8221; Well, Trueconservative, knock yourself out. I will not be intimidated or bullied by you, and you will not be allowed to post disrespctful and non-constructive comments just because you feel like dumping on others. &#8212; Garth</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill-Muskoka</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-50495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill-Muskoka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/#comment-50495</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this will proffer some insight to the issue?

Only in Louisiana - you have to love this lawyer - It&#039;s too good not to share!

Everyone who has ever bought a house will enjoy this.

A New Orleans lawyer sought an FHA loan for a client who lost his house in Hurricane Katrina and wanted to rebuild.  He was told the loan would be granted if he could prove satisfactory title to the parcel of property being offered as collateral.  The title to the property dated back to 1803, which took the Lawyer three months to track down.  After
sending the information to the FHA, he received the following reply:

    (Actual letter):

&quot;Upon review of your letter adjoining your client&#039;s loan application, we note that the request is supported by an Abstract of Title.  While we compliment the able manner in which you have prepared and presented the application, we must point out that you have only cleared title to the proposed collateral property back to 1803.  Before final approval can be accorded, it will be necessary to clear the title back to its origin.&quot;

Annoyed, the lawyer responded as follows:

(Actual Letter):

&quot;Your letter regarding title in Case No. 189156 has been received. I note that you wish to have title extended further than the 194 years covered by the present application. I was unaware that any educated person in this country, particularly those working in the property area, would not know that Louisiana was purchased, by the U.S. from France in
1803, the year of origin identified in our application. For the edification of uninformed FHA bureaucrats, the title to the land prior to U.S. ownership was obtained from France , which had acquired it by Right of Conquest from Spain. The land came into the possession of Spain by Right of Discovery made in the year 1492 by a sea captain named Christopher Columbus, who had been granted the privilege of seeking a
new route to India by the Spanish monarch, Isabella.

The good queen, Isabella, being a pious woman and almost as careful about titles as the FHA, took the precaution of securing the blessing of the Pope before she sold her jewels to finance Columbus&#039; expedition. Now the Pope, as I sure you may know, is the emissary of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. And God, it is commonly accepted, created this world.

Therefore, I believe it is safe to presume that God also made that part of the world called Louisiana.  God, therefore, would be the owner of origin and His origins date back
to before the beginning of time, the world as we know it AND the FHA.

I hope you find God&#039;s original claim to be satisfactory. Now, may we have our loan?&quot;

He got the loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this will proffer some insight to the issue?</p>
<p>Only in Louisiana &#8211; you have to love this lawyer &#8211; It&#8217;s too good not to share!</p>
<p>Everyone who has ever bought a house will enjoy this.</p>
<p>A New Orleans lawyer sought an FHA loan for a client who lost his house in Hurricane Katrina and wanted to rebuild.  He was told the loan would be granted if he could prove satisfactory title to the parcel of property being offered as collateral.  The title to the property dated back to 1803, which took the Lawyer three months to track down.  After<br />
sending the information to the FHA, he received the following reply:</p>
<p>    (Actual letter):</p>
<p>&#8220;Upon review of your letter adjoining your client&#8217;s loan application, we note that the request is supported by an Abstract of Title.  While we compliment the able manner in which you have prepared and presented the application, we must point out that you have only cleared title to the proposed collateral property back to 1803.  Before final approval can be accorded, it will be necessary to clear the title back to its origin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Annoyed, the lawyer responded as follows:</p>
<p>(Actual Letter):</p>
<p>&#8220;Your letter regarding title in Case No. 189156 has been received. I note that you wish to have title extended further than the 194 years covered by the present application. I was unaware that any educated person in this country, particularly those working in the property area, would not know that Louisiana was purchased, by the U.S. from France in<br />
1803, the year of origin identified in our application. For the edification of uninformed FHA bureaucrats, the title to the land prior to U.S. ownership was obtained from France , which had acquired it by Right of Conquest from Spain. The land came into the possession of Spain by Right of Discovery made in the year 1492 by a sea captain named Christopher Columbus, who had been granted the privilege of seeking a<br />
new route to India by the Spanish monarch, Isabella.</p>
<p>The good queen, Isabella, being a pious woman and almost as careful about titles as the FHA, took the precaution of securing the blessing of the Pope before she sold her jewels to finance Columbus&#8217; expedition. Now the Pope, as I sure you may know, is the emissary of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. And God, it is commonly accepted, created this world.</p>
<p>Therefore, I believe it is safe to presume that God also made that part of the world called Louisiana.  God, therefore, would be the owner of origin and His origins date back<br />
to before the beginning of time, the world as we know it AND the FHA.</p>
<p>I hope you find God&#8217;s original claim to be satisfactory. Now, may we have our loan?&#8221;</p>
<p>He got the loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Telfer</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Telfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/12/12/quebecois-nation/#comment-50493</guid>
		<description>Quebec isn&#039;t an anoyance. The separatists are and to this point the majority favour remaining in Canada so lets not forget that. 
I love this country and have had the good fortune to be paid to see the world over my time. Have made many friends outside and have seen and experienced the respect people have for Canada which is something I take pride in and want to keep that and make Canada better.Quebec separating is not going to make it better.
All native groups in this land were the original inhabitants and need to be respected and recognized as such.Quebec and the French were one of the original settlers and their culture;their life must be recognized and respected.Debating the issue re Quebec is ok but insulting will not help our cause any at all. At the same point we must take care not to give in to what the separatists want. It will only devide this nation more and they know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quebec isn&#8217;t an anoyance. The separatists are and to this point the majority favour remaining in Canada so lets not forget that.<br />
I love this country and have had the good fortune to be paid to see the world over my time. Have made many friends outside and have seen and experienced the respect people have for Canada which is something I take pride in and want to keep that and make Canada better.Quebec separating is not going to make it better.<br />
All native groups in this land were the original inhabitants and need to be respected and recognized as such.Quebec and the French were one of the original settlers and their culture;their life must be recognized and respected.Debating the issue re Quebec is ok but insulting will not help our cause any at all. At the same point we must take care not to give in to what the separatists want. It will only devide this nation more and they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
