Comments on: Why we need an election http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/ Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future. Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: patrickmciver.com » Blog Archive » Truth in Politics http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/comment-page-5/#comment-91080 patrickmciver.com » Blog Archive » Truth in Politics Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:37:35 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/#comment-91080 [...] my previous posting, I referenced a blog posting written by that lovely, nieve MP Garth Turner, and how him and I agree that we need an election [...] [...] my previous posting, I referenced a blog posting written by that lovely, nieve MP Garth Turner, and how him and I agree that we need an election [...]

]]> By: KRB http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/comment-page-5/#comment-76539 KRB Tue, 15 May 2007 20:11:10 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/#comment-76539 Ha ha Garth, Dan Cook gives it to you nicely in the Globe today! Go check it out. And to the majority of posters on here, get a life! Most of you are on crack!! Garth, you are a silly little man. How you ended up an MP is beyond me. Ha ha Garth, Dan Cook gives it to you nicely in the Globe today! Go check it out. And to the majority of posters on here, get a life! Most of you are on crack!!

Garth, you are a silly little man. How you ended up an MP is beyond me.

]]> By: Nicholas Gerrier http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/comment-page-5/#comment-75528 Nicholas Gerrier Fri, 11 May 2007 12:41:46 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/04/28/why-we-need-an-election/#comment-75528 I have to say Garth, I Concur. I think back to when Harper was starting out with the Canadian Alliance, and his ideology back then. Not much has changed, besides the wolf in the sheep outfit. Unfortunatly, if there were to be an election now, Harper would get his majority, due to Quebec being bought off by recieving th sponsership program again, only for 20 million less this time, and Quebec doesn't have to saythanks even, no mention that the government of Canada is paying for random Community events, that the nation as a whole, do not partake in. The only way for Harper to be taken off his throne is one of two ways: 1) The Liberals and the NDP form a coalition. 2) The Liberals get someone who could actually beat Harper, perhaps Justin Trudeau, but keep him under control by pairing him with Dion as his Deputy. If Trudeau continues speaking in manners that could be misconstrued, his political life won't last long. Personally, I'd like to know why despite recent studies done pointing to lack of accessiblity for the disabled nation-wide, nothing has been done about that, let alone spoke of. I've noticed there is a Conservative MP who, like myself is disabled, has never brought up this issue himself, which is disturbing, knowing the difficulties dealt with on a daily basis for all disabled individuals. Maybe I should touch on John Baird's environment plan? Why is most of the financial burden is on the average consumer? The Conservatives say that the burden will actually be on major industry. That may be true, but who do you think will absorb those raising costs? Consumers. This is why there has not been a Conservative Government since Kim Campbell in 1993, who took over for Mulroney, who before him, was Joe Clark, who, might I add, was only PM for one year, before Pierre Trudeau was back in office for an additional four years, after already serving eleven years. 15 years of Trudeau, That's the Canada we all want again. If he were here, none of this would be happening, hence, Justin has finally decided to do what so many expected. He will be the one to defeat Harper. I have to say Garth, I Concur. I think back to when Harper was starting out with the Canadian Alliance, and his ideology back then. Not much has changed, besides the wolf in the sheep outfit. Unfortunatly, if there were to be an election now, Harper would get his majority, due to Quebec being bought off by recieving th sponsership program again, only for 20 million less this time, and Quebec doesn’t have to saythanks even, no mention that the government of Canada is paying for random Community events, that the nation as a whole, do not partake in. The only way for Harper to be taken off his throne is one of two ways:
1) The Liberals and the NDP form a coalition.
2) The Liberals get someone who could actually beat Harper, perhaps Justin Trudeau, but keep him under control by pairing him with Dion as his Deputy. If Trudeau continues speaking in manners that could be misconstrued, his political life won’t last long.

Personally, I’d like to know why despite recent studies done pointing to lack of accessiblity for the disabled nation-wide, nothing has been done about that, let alone spoke of. I’ve noticed there is a Conservative MP who, like myself is disabled, has never brought up this issue himself, which is disturbing, knowing the difficulties dealt with on a daily basis for all disabled individuals. Maybe I should touch on John Baird’s environment plan? Why is most of the financial burden is on the average consumer? The Conservatives say that the burden will actually be on major industry. That may be true, but who do you think will absorb those raising costs? Consumers. This is why there has not been a Conservative Government since Kim Campbell in 1993, who took over for Mulroney, who before him, was Joe Clark, who, might I add, was only PM for one year, before Pierre Trudeau was back in office for an additional four years, after already serving eleven years. 15 years of Trudeau, That’s the Canada we all want again. If he were here, none of this would be happening, hence, Justin has finally decided to do what so many expected. He will be the one to defeat Harper.

]]>