<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screwy in Skeena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/</link>
	<description>Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/comment-page-6/#comment-94198</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/#comment-94198</guid>
		<description>A footnote on MSM coverage -


The Ottawa Citizen mentioned the Sharon Stone special liaison appointment and the CPC dissociation from it for the first time to-day, in a brief item on page 5 not important enough to be made available on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A footnote on MSM coverage -</p>
<p>The Ottawa Citizen mentioned the Sharon Stone special liaison appointment and the CPC dissociation from it for the first time to-day, in a brief item on page 5 not important enough to be made available on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/comment-page-6/#comment-94071</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/#comment-94071</guid>
		<description>Frank Frink,

I nominate you to be the first recipient of the hypothetical &quot;Hero of Digital Democracy&quot; award.  

Maybe we&#039;d better make that the &quot;Meritorious Service to Digital Democracy Cross.&quot;  The lack of a Soviet connotation would make it easier to bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Frink,</p>
<p>I nominate you to be the first recipient of the hypothetical &#8220;Hero of Digital Democracy&#8221; award.  </p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;d better make that the &#8220;Meritorious Service to Digital Democracy Cross.&#8221;  The lack of a Soviet connotation would make it easier to bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P. Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/comment-page-6/#comment-94070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P. Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/08/26/screwy-in-skeena/#comment-94070</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Social conservative women, who believe that women should serve a submissive role in society, are as strongly opposed to womenâ€™s equality as any chauvanistic male. They see equality in terms of â€œequality of different rolesâ€ in the eyes of God.

By C. B. Innes on 08.29.07 7:59 pm&lt;/i&gt;

Care to give examples of this?  What do you consider to be submissive?  Staying at home?  Making meals?  

The reason I am asking as this would be news to those social conservative women who aren&#039;t submissive at all.

When SOW rejected Real Women&#039;s application, they rejected equality.  They either serve all women or they aren&#039;t serving equality.  I find it very telling that when Real Women decided to send an application stating they were a lesbian group, that they received an application for funding ASAP.  That&#039;s extreme feminism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Social conservative women, who believe that women should serve a submissive role in society, are as strongly opposed to womenâ€™s equality as any chauvanistic male. They see equality in terms of â€œequality of different rolesâ€ in the eyes of God.</p>
<p>By C. B. Innes on 08.29.07 7:59 pm</i></p>
<p>Care to give examples of this?  What do you consider to be submissive?  Staying at home?  Making meals?  </p>
<p>The reason I am asking as this would be news to those social conservative women who aren&#8217;t submissive at all.</p>
<p>When SOW rejected Real Women&#8217;s application, they rejected equality.  They either serve all women or they aren&#8217;t serving equality.  I find it very telling that when Real Women decided to send an application stating they were a lesbian group, that they received an application for funding ASAP.  That&#8217;s extreme feminism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
