Fair enough. I’m just trying to make the point that Rutherford gives no pretense to being anything other than a conservative. Being that he has a show (and gets paid to do what he does) to run anyone who comes onto his show is aware of that ‘preconceived’ position.

I obviously understand that Garth’s ‘point-of-view’ will be liberal (given the obvious) so I am not surprised (okay on some points a bit surprised) by his position or the fact that the vast majority of people who post here are of similar ilk. After all it is Garth’s blog.

What I do have problems with is some of our tax-funded programs portraying itself to be ‘neutral’ when in fact they are not (hint — the CBC). But that is for another discussion.

Ed the Hun

Exactly, and that’s why I said it is prob better that Garth did not get a chance to talk on Mr. Rutherford’s show. A one sided, entrapment point of view does not consititute a “debate.”

BTW, I would love to listen to Mr. Rutherford’s show but I can only get into the audio vault.

-R

The one and only caller Dave allowed attacked Flaherty over his Income Trust decision and an emailer (read by Dave) called Flaherty a liar.

Poor Jim once again gets no respect. But then again he deserves no respect.