Comments on: Jamie who? http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/ Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future. Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Van http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/comment-page-3/#comment-101106 Van Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:03:34 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/#comment-101106 Bill wrote >Sorry, but that is called The British >North American Act of 1867. It hasn't been called that since 1982 when it was combined with the Constitution Act 1982 to become known as Constitution Acts 1867 and 1982. >Garth is still correct. He is oh so wrong. >The document may have been given a name >change, but it granted the right of >dominion to Canada from British rule. It became part of the constitution in 1982. >It is an Act, not a Constitution per se. Not in the manner the American achieved theirs because they are a republic and our form parliamentary system is very different and thank goodness for that. All our legislation is achieved through Acts that are approved by our parliament and senate members and given royal assent by the Governor General of which our constitution 1867 and 1982 are just two. They have been combined to form the Canadian Constitution. I suggest you check out the link I gave in my previous post. Bill wrote
>Sorry, but that is called The British >North American Act of 1867.

It hasn’t been called that since 1982 when it was combined with the Constitution Act 1982 to become known as Constitution Acts 1867 and 1982.

>Garth is still correct.

He is oh so wrong.

>The document may have been given a name >change, but it granted the right of >dominion to Canada from British rule.

It became part of the constitution in 1982.

>It is an Act, not a Constitution per se.

Not in the manner the American achieved theirs because they are a republic and our form parliamentary system is very different and thank goodness for that.

All our legislation is achieved through Acts that are approved by our parliament and senate members and given royal assent by the Governor General of which our constitution 1867 and 1982 are just two. They have been combined to form the Canadian Constitution. I suggest you check out the link I gave in my previous post.

]]> By: Leasa http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/comment-page-3/#comment-100185 Leasa Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:32:52 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/#comment-100185 By Steve on 10.03.07 11:04 am Walmart does not get one cent from me. I wouldn't buy the last widget on earth there. Especially not after what they did to Bicks last year. Offering farmers less than cost of production on pickles is an insult. I hope they choke on that crap from India. L By Steve on 10.03.07 11:04 am

Walmart does not get one cent from me. I wouldn’t buy the last widget on earth there. Especially not after what they did to Bicks last year. Offering farmers less than cost of production on pickles is an insult. I hope they choke on that crap from India. L

]]> By: got rope? http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/comment-page-3/#comment-100174 got rope? Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:01:07 +0000 http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2007/10/02/jamie-who/#comment-100174 why don’t we concentrate on getting people to vote for someone who is independent! By pjw on 10.03.07 6:34 pm cash is good why don’t we concentrate on getting people to vote for someone who is independent!

By pjw on 10.03.07 6:34 pm

cash is good

]]>