It seems to me that you are missing the point here. It is all about priority spending and what people believe the priorities should be.

The new Conservative priorities are cutting taxes and business regulations, the protection of multi-national corporations, the reduction of social spending, and increased spending on the “big stick” items of police, the arming of border guards, the judicial system, prisons, military combat, and so on.

While Liberals support those policies designed to promote globalism instead of the big stick issues they are more focused on the kind of spending that has positive social implications.

The problem is that if you are going to support the globalist ideology, that both parties espouse, eventually governments will not have the money to support either the “big daddy” or the “nanny state.”

Ultimately, the objective is a world governed by mega-corporations fighting for private dominance of the global economy. What I fail to understand is why so many people have been beguiled into supporting an agenda that in the long term is not in their interests.