<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo to the Middle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/09/28/memo-to-the-middle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/09/28/memo-to-the-middle/</link>
	<description>Current political events, business, real estate, financial and economic news, trends and, above all, the Future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/09/28/memo-to-the-middle/comment-page-2/#comment-177335</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/?p=4587#comment-177335</guid>
		<description>The $80 billion includes a $70 billion infrastructure program spaced over ten years and to be financed with the sale of green bonds to the public. Nice tray, but you failed. — Garth

I haven&#039;t failed anything at all. On the contrary you have demonstrated that you speak with a fork tongue.
 So it is OK for the Liberals to spread their 80 billion over years and yet when you criticize the Conservative spending you always forget to mention that their spending is spread over years as well. In fact in a previous discussion when I pointed that the government spending was spread over a number of years you dismissed it out of hand.  Hum, sounds like an another double standard from the Liberals and yourself once again.  Thanks for showing your true colours Garth.

&lt;em&gt;This spending is not financed with tax dollars. Apples and Buicks. -- Garth&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $80 billion includes a $70 billion infrastructure program spaced over ten years and to be financed with the sale of green bonds to the public. Nice tray, but you failed. — Garth</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t failed anything at all. On the contrary you have demonstrated that you speak with a fork tongue.<br />
 So it is OK for the Liberals to spread their 80 billion over years and yet when you criticize the Conservative spending you always forget to mention that their spending is spread over years as well. In fact in a previous discussion when I pointed that the government spending was spread over a number of years you dismissed it out of hand.  Hum, sounds like an another double standard from the Liberals and yourself once again.  Thanks for showing your true colours Garth.</p>
<p><em>This spending is not financed with tax dollars. Apples and Buicks. &#8212; Garth</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Huggan</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/09/28/memo-to-the-middle/comment-page-2/#comment-177109</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Huggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/?p=4587#comment-177109</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve accounted the societally high ROI 3 year expenditures of all 5 parties; positive externalities like environmental capital costing, R+D, daycare, foreign aid, and mental health + affordable housing programmes to fight homelessness.  Rankings are: 1st Greens $172B, 2nd Libs $45B, 3rd NDP $45B, 4th Bloc $15B, 5th Cons $8B.
Ignoring off-the-chart Greens, Liberals have highest environment and R+D totals, NDP best childcare and highest sindustry penalty, and Bloc the best anti-homelessness strategies: http://externalityaccounting.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve accounted the societally high ROI 3 year expenditures of all 5 parties; positive externalities like environmental capital costing, R+D, daycare, foreign aid, and mental health + affordable housing programmes to fight homelessness.  Rankings are: 1st Greens $172B, 2nd Libs $45B, 3rd NDP $45B, 4th Bloc $15B, 5th Cons $8B.<br />
Ignoring off-the-chart Greens, Liberals have highest environment and R+D totals, NDP best childcare and highest sindustry penalty, and Bloc the best anti-homelessness strategies: <a href="http://externalityaccounting.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://externalityaccounting.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/09/28/memo-to-the-middle/comment-page-2/#comment-177108</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garth.ca/weblog/?p=4587#comment-177108</guid>
		<description>Actually garth I did make it up and I was wrong. The Liberals election promises actually  add up to 80 billion dollars and not the 70 I stated previously. This $80 billion is just for the first 13 days of the election.
That is over $5 billion a day in promises and all this is going to come from the green shift program?.

Source is the National Post. Everyone can view it at : http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/election-2008/story.html?id=808072

&lt;em&gt;The $80 billion includes a $70 billion infrastructure program spaced over ten years and to be financed with the sale of green bonds to the public. Nice tray, but you failed. -- Garth&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually garth I did make it up and I was wrong. The Liberals election promises actually  add up to 80 billion dollars and not the 70 I stated previously. This $80 billion is just for the first 13 days of the election.<br />
That is over $5 billion a day in promises and all this is going to come from the green shift program?.</p>
<p>Source is the National Post. Everyone can view it at : <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/election-2008/story.html?id=808072" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/election-2008/story.html?id=808072</a></p>
<p><em>The $80 billion includes a $70 billion infrastructure program spaced over ten years and to be financed with the sale of green bonds to the public. Nice tray, but you failed. &#8212; Garth</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
